Soro SEO is $39. This is the one comparison where price is not the argument
Four dollars is not a reason to choose anything. Soro is one of the few tools in this category priced like ours, it sells no backlinks, and its single-tier simplicity is a genuine virtue. So this page is about the three things that actually differ.
Where two cheap tools diverge
Soro SEO is $39 a month on a single tier with a 14-day money-back guarantee and no free trial, as of October 2026. It does keyword research, article generation, meta data, internal and external linking, alt text and AI search optimisation, publishing to WordPress. Its published limitations are no free trial, limited schema control, no backlink acquisition and the single tier.
The single tier is worth defending as a design choice. Nobody enjoys working out which of nine plans they need, and a tool that charges one price for everything has removed a decision you did not want to make.
The three real differences are platform coverage, whether you can try it without paying, and what happens after publishing.
The three differences
Everything else on these two products is close enough that it should not decide anything.
- Four platforms, not one
- WordPress, Shopify, Ghost, Webflow and a custom endpoint. Soro is WordPress, so the tool ends where your stack changes.
- A free tier, not a refund window
- You can run it before paying. A money-back guarantee means paying first and arguing later if it does not fit.
- Measurement after publishing
- Rank tracking per article and a site audit of what is already live. Soro's listing does not state either.
- AI citation scoring before publishing
- Soro states AI search optimisation; this scores each draft and shows what is marking it down.
- Local payment rails
- Card, mobile money and USSD, which for some readers is the whole decision.
Try it before paying. The free tier needs no card.
Start freeSide by side
| Soro SEO | Visorank | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $39 a month, single tier | $35 a month |
| Pricing simplicity | One tier, nothing to choose | Three tiers by volume |
| Try before paying | No free trial, 14-day money back | Free tier |
| Publishing targets | WordPress | WordPress, Shopify, Ghost, Webflow, custom endpoint |
| Backlinks sold | No | No |
| Schema control | Limited | Article and FAQ structured data |
| Internal and external linking | Yes | Internal link pass across the site |
| AI search optimisation | Stated | Scored per draft, with reasons |
| Rank tracking | Not stated | Included |
| Site audit | Not stated | Included |
Competitor figures collected October 2026 from published listings, not from using the product. Check their own pricing page before deciding on this basis.
What this category charges
Most of it converges on $99 a month, and nothing about the products explains why.
Where Soro SEO is the better buy
If one price for everything is worth more to you than tiers. That is a real preference and their packaging serves it better.
If you are on WordPress permanently and want a tool that does one thing without options.
They sell no backlinks, same as us, which in this category puts both products on the right side of a line most competitors cross.
Neither of us has an agency tier, team seats or white labelling.
Run the free audit and see what your site already needs.
Start freeQuestions worth asking first
Why is Visorank cheaper than most of this category?
Mostly because it is one person's product with no sales team and no link network to operate. The price chart on this page shows the cluster at $99, and nothing about those products explains the gap. Judge both on what they do rather than on either number.
Does a free tier matter if there is a money-back guarantee?
It changes who carries the risk. A free tier lets you find out it does not fit before any money moves. A guarantee means paying, discovering, then requesting. Most people do not request.
What if I only publish to WordPress?
Then the biggest difference on this page does not apply to you, and the comparison comes down to the free tier and the measurement features. Try both.